Fantasy Saloon Pussy Good, Nevada

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Jan-6-panel-pushes-Trump-s-prosecution-in-17663354.php

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Jan. 6 committee urged the Justice Department on Monday to bring criminal charges against Donald Trump for the violent 2021 Capitol insurrection, calling for accountability for the former president and "a time of reflection and reckoning."

At a final meeting Monday, the committee alleged violations of four criminal statutes by Trump, in both the run-up to the riot and during the insurrection itself, as it recommended the former president for prosecution to the Justice Department. Among the charges they recommend for prosecution is aiding an insurrection — an effort to hold him directly accountable for his supporters who stormed the Capitol that day.

The committee also voted 9-0 to approve its final report, which will include findings, interview transcripts and legislative recommendations. The full report is expected to be released on Wednesday.

The report's 154-page summary, made public as the hearing ended, found that Trump engaged in a "multi-part conspiracy" to overturn the election. While the majority of the report's main findings are not new, it altogether represents one of the most damning portraits of an American president in recent history, laying out in great detail Trump's broad effort to overturn his own defeat and what the lawmakers say is his direct responsibility for the insurrection of his supporters.

Quote from: Blkfyre on Dec 19, 2022, 03:19 PMhttps://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Jan-6-panel-pushes-Trump-s-prosecution-in-17663354.php

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Jan. 6 committee urged the Justice Department on Monday to bring criminal charges against Donald Trump for the violent 2021 Capitol insurrection, calling for accountability for the former president and "a time of reflection and reckoning."

At a final meeting Monday, the committee alleged violations of four criminal statutes by Trump, in both the run-up to the riot and during the insurrection itself, as it recommended the former president for prosecution to the Justice Department. Among the charges they recommend for prosecution is aiding an insurrection — an effort to hold him directly accountable for his supporters who stormed the Capitol that day.

The committee also voted 9-0 to approve its final report, which will include findings, interview transcripts and legislative recommendations. The full report is expected to be released on Wednesday.

The report's 154-page summary, made public as the hearing ended, found that Trump engaged in a "multi-part conspiracy" to overturn the election. While the majority of the report's main findings are not new, it altogether represents one of the most damning portraits of an American president in recent history, laying out in great detail Trump's broad effort to overturn his own defeat and what the lawmakers say is his direct responsibility for the insurrection of his supporters.

All talk and waste of time and money.
No statutes listed due to they have no laws broken.
Many Law professors have stated there is nothing here.
This is going no where.

Quote from: Bande on Dec 19, 2022, 05:42 PMAll talk and waste of time and money.
No statutes listed due to they have no laws broken.
Many Law professors have stated there is nothing here.
This is going no where.

Dude, no statutes were listed because the report HASN'T BEEN RELEASED YET. If you had read the story it would say that what was talked about was the overview/conclusions they came to and that all the relevant information such as that would be shared when the full report was released.

Quote from: Bande on Dec 19, 2022, 05:42 PMNo statutes listed due to they have no laws broken.

They say ignorance is bliss. Is it?

Here are the referred charges, complete with statutes:

It sounds like a long process.  Recommend to DOJ (done).  DOJ charges Trump (maybe).  Endless legal delays that Trump is a pro at.  Long court trial.  Then I'd guess if it even gets that far a jury is deadlocked and case is dismissed....lol.

Quote from: dogwalker on Dec 19, 2022, 06:58 PMIt sounds like a long process.  Recommend to DOJ (done).  DOJ charges Trump (maybe).  Endless legal delays that Trump is a pro at.  Long court trial.  Then I'd guess if it even gets that far a jury is deadlocked and case is dismissed....lol.

Maybe so. But the charges related to the stolen documents found by the FBI should be relatively straightforward. The process for those charges might not take so long.

One thing we know for sure is that if Trump is convicted of any crime he will say it was all so unfair and that the judge and jury were radical socialist liberals who rigged the case against him. In fact, he's already starting to say these kinds of things on "Truth Social." What a psycho.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/white-collar-and-criminal-law/trumps-insurrection-referral-spotlights-bar-to-holding-office

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/what-trump-s-legal-perils-mean-for-his-white-house-bid-for-2024

Quote from: Bande on Dec 19, 2022, 05:42 PMAll talk and waste of time and money.
No statutes listed due to they have no laws broken.
Many Law professors have stated there is nothing here.
This is going no where.

Here you go, all 154 pages including charges recommended: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23466430-introductory-material-to-the-final-report-of-the-select-committee

As a reminder before you say Democratic witnesses skewed the facts:

SELECT COMMITTEE WITNESSES WERE ALMOST ENTIRELY REPUBLICAN

SELECT COMMITTEE WITNESSES WERE ALMOST ENTIRELY REPUBLICAN

Quote from: HighStepper on Jul 21, 2022, 10:50 PMWhat we cannot ignore is that we have longtime conservative Republicans who were loyal to Trump giving testimony under oath. 
There are no Trump political enemies.

Discussed in previous thread https://fantasysaloon.com/index.php?msg=7097

Quote from: Bande on Dec 19, 2022, 05:42 PMAll talk and waste of time and money.
No statutes listed due to they have no laws broken.
Many Law professors have stated there is nothing here.
This is going no where.

Here is a lawyer breaking down exactly what the report meant and those statues you say are needed. He also talks about the laws he broke

boring!

Imagine this..
Nancy needs to face charges..

Quote from: Blkfyre on Dec 24, 2022, 02:55 PMHere is a lawyer breaking down exactly what the report meant and those statues you say are needed. He also talks about the laws he broke

Quote from: Blkfyre on Dec 24, 2022, 02:55 PMHere is a lawyer breaking down exactly what the report meant and those statues you say are needed. He also talks about the laws he broke

I hear a bunch of mumbo jumbo.
Ones opinion against several law professors.
We will see. The hearings had a bunch of hear say.

Quote from: Bande on Dec 31, 2022, 12:00 AMI hear a bunch of mumbo jumbo.
Ones opinion against several law professors.
We will see. The hearings had a bunch of hear say.

It's mumbo jumbo to you because YOU AREN'T A LAWYER despite your comments about legal matters.

Hmm. So if a lot of people say something it must be true despite what someone on YouTube says?  So that means Trump is guilty because a lot of experts say he is?  Cool, thanks for clearing that up!